Increasing Tuition? University of Lucerne Resists Political Pressure

Tuition fees was one of the central and ever recurring topics in the Global Perspectives Programme 2012. However, tuition fees are not only relevant for access to higher education, but also for the relation between society and university and therefore for this year’s GPP. Additionally, when students from the US and Switzerland meet to discuss whichever higher education issue, they almost inevitably find themselves discussing tuition fees one time or another, since the differences are so incredibly huge.

In Europe, we can see a general trend to increase (or even introduce, as in some German Bundesländer) tuition fees. I have been reporting in an earlier post about the plans of the ETH and EPFL to considerably increase their fees. The University of Lucerne now opposes this trend. At the moment, tuition in Lucerne amounts to 1400 Swiss Francs (a bit more than 1400 USD) for students coming from Switzerland and 2000 Swiss Francs for students from abroad. The Government of the Canton Lucerne now imposed political pressure on the university to increase tuition. However, the university resisted and decided to keep fees as they are right now. As compensation, the university now charges a one time enrollment fee of 100 Swiss Francs. Further, professors agreed to get an increase in their salary half a year later.

In an interview with a local radio station, Rektor Paul Richli named two reasons. First, he deems it important to safeguard equal opportunities to access higher education. Second, he wants the University of Lucerne to remain competitive with other universities. While the first line of argument is somewhat obvious, the second it is remarkable insofar as it provides further evidence of a growing awareness of a shift to a more competitive higher education landscape also in continental Europe.

University and Society: An Appeal to Protect Academic Independence Against Business Interests

In a few days the Basel Global Perspectives Programme Group 2013 start their adventure. This year’s GPP topic reads: University and Society: Meeting expectations? This is not only a challenging but also (again) a very current topic. In order to assess whether we are meeting society’s expectations we first have to figure them out. This leads us preliminarily to two questions that might be the GPP 2013 umbrella questions. What is a university? What is its role in society?

With the very same questions, 27 professors from the University of Zurich introduce their International Appeal for the Protection of Academic Independence. The Appeal claims that university sponsoring by business actors threatens academic freedom and vigorously calls for protection of the latter.

In my opinion, the relation between university and the economic sector is an interesting and important question for the GPP 2013. It might be especially interesting because, at least I assume so, in Europe we might have more fundamental reservations against university sponsoring than in the US.

So, what is your opinion? What do you think of the Zurich Appeal? Does university sponsoring threaten academic freedom, and if so, how can we defend the latter?

International Appeal
for the Protection of Academic Independence

Now that cooperation between the private sector and public universities has all but become the norm, in Europe as elsewhere, it is time to ask some basic questions: What is a university? And what is its role in society?

Universities grew out of the idea of establishing a place where freedom of research, education and scholarship is protected and beyond venal influence. They serve the common good and in turn are supported by the community. Directly linked to this founding idea is the academic ethos that preserves the institution of the university as a special place, free from political, ideological and commercial interests. Freedom of teaching and research is protected by the Swiss Constitution.

Against this background, it is self-evident that a public university should neither cooperate with nor accept sponsorship from institutions associated with public scandal or unethical conduct. That is damaging to the academic reputation of any university. And it impinges upon the independence of the scholars concerned, particularly those directly funded by such institutions, undermining their status as guarantors of independence and ethically-minded scholarship.

The University of Zurich was born of this same spirit of independent thinking in 1833. It is “the first university in Europe to be founded by a democratic state instead of by either a monarch or the church”. This proud claim stands to this day on the university’s website. The question is: are today’s universities still sufficiently independent in an age of cooperation and sponsorship?

In April 2012, the Executive Board of the University of Zurich concluded a cooperation agreement, in camera, with the top management of UBS (Union Bank of Switzerland). The agreement entails sponsoring of the university by UBS to the tune of 100 million Swiss francs and the establishment of a “UBS International Centre of Economics in Society” within the scope of the university. Neither the public nor the research and teaching staff were asked their opinion. The agreement between the university and UBS was concluded secretly in the spring of 2012.

This procedure brings the issue of sponsorship into sharp focus. The Executive Board of the University concedes that the bank is using the university as a platform to further its interests. However, UBS is a particular case of a business that has been shown in the past to have engaged in unethical practices. The fact that the bank was able to place its logo at the University of Zurich has nothing to do with scholarship and everything to do with marketing.

It is a glaring example of the problematic nature of academic sponsorship. But there are many more instances, in other European countries, of questionable university sponsorship deals. In one case, in June 2011, Deutsche Bank had to withdraw from a controversial sponsorship arrangement because of justified public criticism. This shows that sponsorship involving specific vested interests and secret deals – in contrast to altruistic patronage and donation by benefactors – represents a threat to the impartiality of university research and teaching. The very academic ethos is at risk.

As citizens, researchers, academics and students, we appeal to the leaders of the universities and all who bear responsibility for our educational institutions, at home and abroad, to safeguard the precious heritage of free and independent scholarship, and to avoid endangering the academic ethos in controversial collaborations.